Test cricket, the longest and most gruelling format of the game, often pushes players to their physical limits, making injuries an unavoidable part of the contest. Recently, a spirited debate has erupted between India’s head coach Gautam Gambhir and England’s captain Ben Stokes regarding the introduction of injury substitutions during Test matches. This controversy was sparked by India’s wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant’s brave yet painful outing in the fourth Test at Manchester, despite sustaining a fracture in his right foot. Gambhir advocates for permitting injury replacements, arguing it ensures fairness and player welfare, whereas Stokes vehemently opposes the idea, fearing exploitation of such rules could disrupt the integrity of the game.

Gautam Gambhir’s call for fairness and player welfare regarding the issue

Gambhir is a strong proponent of introducing injury substitutions in Test cricket, a stance emboldened by Pant’s courageous performance at Old Trafford. After retiring hurt due to a fractured foot, Pant returned to add crucial runs for India, exemplifying not just bravery but also the immense pressure players face to keep fighting even when physically compromised. Gambhir acknowledged Pant’s heroism and underscored the need for rules that prioritize player health and team balance. He argued that if umpires and match referees confirm a clearly visible major injury, then allowing a substitute player is both necessary and logical.

“If the umpires and the match referee sees and feels that is a major injury, I think it’s very important. It’s very important to have this rule where you can get a substitute – that is, if it’s very visible. There’s nothing wrong in doing that, especially in a series like this where it’s been such a closely fought series in the previous three Test matches. Imagine if we would’ve had to play with ten men against 11. How unfortunate would this be for us,” Gambhir stated in the press conference.

Gambhir emphasized that playing a match with ten fit players against eleven is unfair and does not reflect the spirit of competitive cricket, especially in a tightly contested series. He cited the current allowance for concussion and COVID-19 substitutes, suggesting extending this principle to other serious injuries makes sense to protect teams and athletes alike. With Dhruv Jurel stepping in as a wicketkeeping substitute but unable to bat, India effectively played with a depleted line-up, which Gambhir views as an injustice that could be remedied with appropriate rule changes. He believes such a policy would safeguard player welfare without compromising the competitiveness or fairness of Test cricket.

Also READ: ENG vs IND: Sanjay Manjrekar calls Ben Stokes ‘spoiled kid’ after Manchester Test ends in draw – here’s why

Ben Stokes shares his take over the matter indicating the loopholes

Conversely, England captain Stokes dismissed the notion of injury replacements as “absolutely ridiculous” and cautioned against its adoption. He argued that the potential for teams to manipulate medical assessments and exploit loopholes for tactical advantage could be immense. Stokes illustrated his point by suggesting that if MRI scans became the gateway for replacements, even minor inflammations or pre-existing niggles could lead to calling in fresh players — fundamentally undermining the selection integrity for a match.

“I think it’s absolutely ridiculous that there’s a conversation around an injury replacement,” Stokes said. “I think that there would just be too many loopholes for teams to be able to go through. You pick your XI for a game; injuries are part of the game. I completely understand the concussion replacement – player welfare, [and] player safety. But I think the conversation should just honestly stop around injury replacements because if you stick me in an MRI scanner, I could get someone else in straightaway,” Stokes shared in the press conference.

Stokes does support concussion replacements as a necessary measure for player safety but draws a clear line at injury substitutions, insisting that injuries are part of playing cricket and teams must manage with the eleven players they select. His concern is that opening the door to injury replacements would lead to widespread misuse and strategic abuse, compromising the purity and challenge of the game. Thus, he urges that the debate be “shut down and stopped” to preserve the essence of Test cricket.

Also READ: ENG vs IND: Shubman Gill reveals why Ben Stokes’ ‘handshake’ was declined on Day 5 of the Manchester Test